Summary of All Courses Taught Between Spring 1998 and Fall 2002, plus Summer 2003

Scale: Strongly Agree (SA) 4

Agrees (A) 3

Neutral (N) 2

Disagree (D) 1

Strongly Disagree (SD) 0

1: The course schedule was flexible and well paced, with realistic deadlines.	2: The content and workload of the course were suitably challenging.	3: There was enough variety in class format to keep my interest an promote student participation.
mean = 3.04	mean = 3.20	mean = 2.78
4: Tests and graded assignments were fair and relevant.	5: Students received consistent and regular feedback.	6: The goals and objectives of this course were understandable.
mean = 3.06	mean = 2.94	mean = 3.01
7: The course met its goals.	8: Instructor evidenced knowledge of the subject matter.	9: Instructor facilitated understanding of complex concepts.
mean = 2.94	mean = 3.63	mean = 3.27
10: Instructor was available for individual help.	11: Instructor responded to student ideas, criticisms, and suggestions.	12: Instructor encouraged students to express themselves freely and openly.
mean = 3.38	mean = 3.31	mean = 3.37
13: Instructor facilitated students’ thinking for themselves.	14: Instructor appeared to be genuinely concerned with whether or not students were learning.	15: Instructor helped students develop interest in the subject matter.
mean = 3.26	mean = 3.19	mean = 2.97
16: I would recommend this instructor to another student.	17: The quality and amount of my learning in this class were high.	18: What grade do you expect in this class?
mean = 3.07	mean = 2.85	mean = 3.36